Comparison of 3D tracking systems

From XVRWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a comparison of camera-based tracking systems, electromagnetic tracking systems, and other systems like UWB tracking systems. These systems are used for VR and AR headsets, and 3D controllers.

System Max Update Rate (Hz) Does the system have an IMU? Kalman Filtering Stationary Position Accuracy Stationary Rotation Accuracy Range (radius) Technology Position and Rotation
Polhemus Liberty 240 Hz No Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Polhemus Viper (Viper 4) 240 Hz No Optional about 0.5 mm for XYZ position[1] about 5 feet Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Polhemus Viper (Viper 8 and Viper 16) 960 Hz No Optional Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Polhemus Patriot 60 Hz No Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Polhemus 3SPACE Isotrak II 60 Hz No Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Polhemus FASTRAK 120 Hz No Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Razer Hydra 60 Hz Yes Yes Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Sixense STEM (Unreleased) 240 Hz Yes Yes Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Lodestar 10 cm UWB
SteamVR tracking Position and rotation
IndoTraq UWB Position and rotation
Oculus Rift DK2 75 Hz Yes Camera-based tracking (Infrared LEDs and computer vision) Position and rotation
AMFITRACK Gen3 250 Hz[2] Yes Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Ascension Flock of Birds 144 Hz 1.78 mm 0.5 degrees Electromagnetic Position and rotation
Ascension 3D Bird Inertial Rotation only

References[edit]